code-reviewer

Quick Review

The skill provides a structured framework for code review with three Python scripts and reference documentation. However, the Description and SKILL.md contain significant gaps: (1) The Description mentions 'automated code analysis, best practice checking, security scanning, and review checklist generation' but SKILL.md provides only vague feature lists without concrete examples of what these tools actually check or output. (2) Script usage is too generic ('python script.py [options]') without explaining what inputs are needed, what analysis is performed, or what outputs to expect. (3) A CLI agent reading only the Description would not know which script to invoke for specific tasks (e.g., 'check for security vulnerabilities' or 'generate PR review comments'). (4) Novelty is limited - standard linting/analysis tools like eslint, pylint, or SonarQube could perform similar tasks, and it's unclear what unique value these scripts provide beyond existing CLI tools. The structure is reasonable with separate reference docs, but the core capability descriptions need concrete details aboutChecks performed, output formats, and when to use each tool.