senior-fullstack

Quick Review

The skill provides a reasonable organizational structure for fullstack development with clear references to supporting documentation and scripts. However, it suffers from significant weaknesses: (1) The descriptions are overly generic and vague - terms like 'Automated scaffolding' and 'Deep analysis' don't explain what the tools actually do or when to use them; (2) Script usage examples lack concrete parameter explanations; (3) Most critically, the novelty score is very low because the skill essentially wraps standard development practices and common tools (linting, scaffolding, code analysis) that a CLI agent with web access could already accomplish. The tech stack list and best practices are standard industry knowledge. While the structure is clean and references are well-organized, the skill doesn't demonstrate sufficient complexity or unique automation to justify its existence over a capable LLM with standard tooling. To improve: provide specific, concrete examples of what each script generates/analyzes, demonstrate unique integrations or workflows not easily replicated, and show clear cost/time savings over standard approaches.