spec-writing

Quick Review

The skill addresses spec-writing for agentic development but suffers from severe genericness. The description and instructions are templated boilerplate that don't explain what spec-writing actually entails or how the skill helps. A CLI agent would struggle to invoke this meaningfully because it lacks concrete guidance on: what makes a good spec, what format to use, what sections are required, or how to structure sprint requirements. The structure is clean and properly references external files (errors.md, examples.md, testing-configuration.md), which is good practice. However, the core SKILL.md provides almost no actionable task knowledge—just placeholder text like 'provides automated assistance' and 'produces structured output.' The novelty is moderate since spec-writing guidance could save tokens vs. a CLI agent figuring out formats from scratch, but the current implementation is too vague to demonstrate this value. To improve: replace generic instructions with specific spec-writing steps, explain the specs.md format, outline required sections (scope, requirements, testing config), and give concrete guidance that enables autonomous execution.