status-code-recommender

Quick Review

The skill has clear structure and addresses a useful niche (recommending HTTP status codes for API development), but severely lacks concrete implementation details. The description is too generic and repetitive ('status code recommender' appears verbatim throughout without explaining what it actually does). There's no actual knowledge base of status codes, decision trees, or logic for recommendations. A CLI agent would not know HOW to recommend status codes based on this documentation alone. To improve: add a knowledge base mapping scenarios to appropriate status codes (200, 201, 400, 401, 404, 500, etc.), decision logic for different REST operations, and concrete examples of when to use each code. The novelty score reflects that status code selection is a real pain point for developers, but the current implementation provides no actual solution.